NAICS Codes:
NAICS 541512 - Computer Systems Design Services
NAICS 541519 - Other Computer Related Services
NAICS 711510 - Independent Artists, Writers & Performers
NAICS 423610 - Electrical Equipment, Lamps, Fixtures, Wiring
NAICS 512110 - Motion Picture & Video Productions
NAICS 541430 - Graphic Design Services
SIC Codes:
SIC 7336 - Commercial Art and Graphic Design
SIC 7373 - Computer Integrated Systems Design
SIC 7389 - Business Services, Not Elsewhere Classified
SIC 7819 - Service Allied to motion picture production
SIC 8999 - Services, n.e.c.
Thanks to The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (provision mentioned in Subtitle C – Tax Incentives for Business, Part III - Incentives For New Jobs on page 223 of the act –whew!) there is a new veteran category eligible for the WOTC.
For a limited duration (January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010) companies can take a maximum tax credit of $2,400 FOR HIRING ANY VETERAN COMPLETE ARTICLE
|
Certified DVBE Small Business N0. 043884
|
DVBE SERVICES

Subject: Elimination of the Good Faith Effort in Public Contracting Code
Now that the Good Faith Effort (GFE) is gone, what does it mean to Disabled Veteran Business Enterprises (DVBE),
primes and the businesses that make their living from the outreach required by the GFE process?
Overview of the DVBE program
When the DVBE program began in 1989 there were very few DVBE available, especially in the construction industry.
GFE was a very important process 20 years ago because it made big businesses reach out to try and find DVBE.
With 1100 or so DVBE certified in the state today, the GFE has outlived its usefulness. Regardless of what we are
told by large primes, there are many DVBE that provide goods or services in all industries and there are growing
businesses that can develop new capabilities fairly quickly.
The basic law for the DVBE program does one thing. It tells the state agencies that at the end of the fiscal year (30
June) the agency should have contracted 3% of its total procurement dollars with DVBE. This can be done directly or
via any tier under a prime that uses the DVBE.
This law is referred to as the “program requirement”
At the end of the reporting period, if the agency hasn’t met the 3% DVBE goal then it must prepare a plan for how it
will improve that % for the next year.
The DVBE Incentive (SB 115)
This incentive was enacted to help agencies meet the legislated 3% DVBE goal. The minimum incentive is 1 % and
the maximum is 5% of the lowest responsible and responsive bid. Agencies may also offer an incentive scale under
which bidders obtaining higher levels of participation qualify for greater incentive.
Do not confuse the incentive percentages with the DVBE program requirement which has most often been 3%. These
are “apples and oranges” numbers.
The incentive percentages are used to develop a price adjustment, for evaluation purposes only, once an apparent
lowest bid has been determined. The incentive percentages are taken against the apparent low bid and the final
adjustment determines what bidder wins. Generally speaking if you use 0% DVBE participation you get no adjustment
on your bid price. If you use maximum DVBE participation you get the maximum adjustment articulated in the
particular contract.
It is really pretty simple.
Also remember that the adjustment may be capped, usually at $100,000.
$100,000 may not get you much in a $50 million dollar bid so you may have to target your bids to smaller contracts.
Also the agency does not have to cap the incentive adjustment, so we often work with the agencies on large contracts
to adjust the cap upward.
And there is nothing that stops you the DVBE from going to the contracting officer and recommending that they
increase the cap.
If you are bidding the contract as the prime, you automatically get the full DVBE incentive. You are not required to
sub contract to other DVBE.
The DVBE incentive and the small business preferences are applied cumulatively. The small business preference is
always capped and the DVBE incentive often is capped also.
What are the ramifications of the elimination of GFE?
First the businesses that have executed GFE for primes over the past years may want to change their business
model. They can opt to offer primes a listing of DVBE to help them meet the incentive or the specified % of DVBE
goal. The specified goal may be less than or greater than 3% as appropriate for each solicitation. It will be an action
that actually provides DVBE to primes rather than just the paperwork.
For the contracting process, careful decision making is now more important to ensure bidders will be responsive to
program requirements. Key decisions include:
When should a solicitation be exempt from DVBE requirement?
What is the appropriate level of DVBE participation to require?
How should the DVBE incentive be used to achieve greater DVBE participation?
The new law only impacts solicitations issued on or after July 28, 2009. Buyers must now specify an appropriate goal
in their solicitations because if primes don’t meet the stated goal then their bid is non-responsive. Clearly we don’t
want agencies getting all non responsive bids so DVBE may see more solicitations without a program requirement, a
goal of less than 3%, or a goal of more than 3%. A DVBE incentive(s) may also be offered in any competitive
solicitation whether or not it includes a required DVBE goal. .
This is where the incentive comes into play. Per regulations the incentive must be in all contracts when the solicitation
includes a required DVBE goal unless, in very specific cases, a senior member of the agency opts to leave it out.
This is only done if that agency has made the 3% DVBE goal (on its total contract dollars) 2 out of the 3 previous
years. If the agency opts to leave the DVBE program requirement out of a contract, and this will likely be the case
more often now with GFE gone, then the agency can still put the incentive in the contract.
In this case primes can be responsive without DVBE participation but would not get the incentive adjustment if they
don’t use DVBE.
Note that an argument against the incentive has always been that it costs the state more money but that is not the
case if all primes use full DVBE participation. In this case, which is a “win-win” for all concerned, the adjustment is the
same for all bids, the lowest bid still wins, and full DVBE participation is attained.
The elimination of GFE from the contracting process is a huge win for the State of California. The time and money
saved will be immense.
DVBE must listen to the needs of primes, especially in the construction industry, must develop services and
commodities which meet the needs that the primes articulate, and must be price competitive.
It must be noted that there is some opposition to the elimination of GFE and there may be follow-on proposed “clean
up” legislation from other entities, especially in the construction industry with regards to Public Works Contracts in the
state.
The Alliance will stay abreast of this action and keep all advised.
Technical Support via Twiter
|
Join Our Blog